Both papers pointed out that tests measuring depression-like
symptoms aren’t always helpful in studying depression. The Chaudhury paper said
that chronic mild stress (CMS) paradigms and physically aversive stimuli
inhibit ventral tegmental area (VTA) dopamine neurons, whereas more severe
stressors and severe social stressors will increase neuron activity. Because of
this, both papers agree that a different method must be used to study
depression-like behaviors.
Instead, they suggest studying circuits that are
translational between rodents and humans. Both papers researched the VTA-NAc
pathway by stimulating dopamine neurons using optogenetics. This has shown to
be an important pathway in depression, especially relating to susceptibility
vs. resilience. However, they differed by the stressor used to cause the
depression-like behaviors.
Tye et al. temporally excited VTA dopamine neurons using channelrhodopsin-2
(ChR2) in a phasic firing pattern. When combined with a twelve-week CMS
paradigm, illumination increased kicking and swimming behavior in ChR2 animals.
They found that locomotion wasn’t increased in an open field test (OFT), so the
increase in movement was from VTA dopamine activation, not just a general
increase in locomotion.
Chaudhury et al. investigated the use of optogenetics in resilient
vs. susceptible animals that were subjected to a ten-day social defeat stress
paradigm. They used ChR2 to phasically induce VTA dopamine neuron firing. Optical
phasic firing stimulation of the VTA-NAc dopamine neuronal pathway induced the depression-like
phenotype in socially stressed mice. By inhibiting the VTA-NAc pathway by using
a halorhodopsin (NpHR), the mice subjected to social stress became more
resilient. They discovered that susceptible mice have increased dopamine neuron
firing in this circuit.
The results of the two papers suggests that further research
should be done on brain circuits to treat depression, and optogenetics seems
like a valuable way to approach it.
No comments:
Post a Comment